In response to Natalie Esquire’s recent comments about Caitlin Clark being the “face of the league,” fans of the Iowa basketball star have pushed back, expressing frustration over what they perceive as a double standard. Esquire, in a widely discussed interview, mentioned that Clark, who has become one of the most recognizable names in women’s basketball, may not have the same impact on the sport if she were a man, hinting that her rise is connected to the increasing popularity of women’s basketball and her dynamic playing style.
However, the backlash came quickly, with fans pointing out the apparent racial undertones in Esquire’s comments. Some took to social media, arguing, “Never would have said this if Steph Curry was white.” The remark was a pointed critique of how race and gender can influence media narratives, particularly in the world of sports.
Clark’s supporters argue that she is breaking barriers in a way similar to NBA stars like Curry, whose on-court dominance and marketability have made him a household name. The comparison sparked a broader conversation about how women athletes are often scrutinized differently than their male counterparts and how race can play a subtle yet significant role in these discussions. Fans continue to defend Clark, asserting that her achievements deserve recognition on their own merit, irrespective of racial dynamics.
