Why Brendan Shanahan’s Decision to Remain with the Toronto Maple Leafs Is Good
Though the best corporations avoid rash or emotional moves, Toronto is desperate for a Stanley Cup victory. Executive firings and instability are the hallmarks of failing franchises. Nobody should know that better than the Leafs and their supporters.
Stability at the top was associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs’ most prosperous periods in franchise history.
Over his 29-year tenure as team president, Conn Smythe oversaw seven Stanley Cup victories. During his 14-year reign, Punch Imlach won four titles.
They all have distinct responsibilities inside the company. Longtime Leaf owner Smythe held the positions of general manager and coach with Imlach.
It should come as no surprise to the Leafs and their supporters that the team hasn’t won a title since the middle of the Imlach era.
The sacking of head coach Sheldon Keefe and another playoff collapse involving a star-studded team have escalated criticism of Maple Leafs president Brendan Shanahan.
Positive Aspects of the Toronto Maple Leafs’ Choice to Retain Shanahan Brendan
The proportion of Smythe’s leaves was.547, whereas Imlach’s leaves were at.539. The majority of the time, they managed to win teams.
Vintage enthusiasts will remember Harold Ballard’s terrible rule in the 1980s. The Leafs were a laughingstock across the league in addition to going years without a real, decent squad.
Under Cliff Fletcher and Pat Burns, the underdog Leafs of the early 1990s made two unforgettable runs in the last four of the playoffs. The Leafs advanced to two more Conference Finals with the aid of Pat Quinn and Mats Sundin.
With no realistic chance of winning a championship, the Leafs spent the remaining years alternating between being mediocre and bottom feeders.
All of that changed with Shanahan’s appointment as the Leafs president. Their track record over the previous ten years has been around a percentage of 600 points.
