SAD NEWS:Travis Kelce on the 49ers’ decision to play in overtime was declined due to…

The decision by the San Francisco 49ers to start the game in overtime has come to be discussed by quarterbacks every Monday morning.

On Sunday night, though, it appears that the Kansas City Chiefs were immediately pleased with the Niners.

The overtime coin toss was won by the Niners, but there seemed to be some misunderstanding because of new regulations that were put in place this season.
Mecole Hardman acknowledged that he was unaware that his score had won the Super Bowl, despite the fact that San Francisco players had been under fire for their ignorance of the regulations.

However, Travis Kelce was fully aware of the regulations and openly applauded the Niners’ choice.

Are you sure? The referee asked Fred Warner when they stated they wanted to receive, and I’m not trying to pick on him. You’re sure you want to get it? Yes, I want to receive,” he replied. On their “New Heights podcast with his brother Jason, Kelce declared, “I want the ball.

You receive what you win when you win the coin toss. They gave it straight to us, giving you the chance to have the advantage.

Relationship Coach Says Travis Kelce’s Sideline Outburst Should Concern Taylor SwiftAccording to the Chiefs, they redesigned the talks during meetings before the big game and started talking about the new overtime guidelines as early as spring training.

Fullback Kyle Juszczyk of the 49ers acknowledged that he assume[d] you just want the ball to score a touchdown and win. That must not be the case. I’m not really sure what the plan is there. No, we hadn’t discussed it.

Niners’ line of defense Nor was Arik Armstead aware of the regulations.

“It surprised me since I was unaware of the new playoff overtime regulation, he remarked, according to ESPN. In terms of that, I really had no idea what was going on.

The plan, according to coach Kyle Shanahan, was to go for sudden death on the third possession of overtime.

“We wanted to be the ones with the opportunity to go win it if both teams matched and scored, he stated.
We were trying to keep them to at least a field goal after we scored that field goal. If we did, we felt like we had it after all.

The Chiefs appeared to imply, though, that there would never be a second possession. According to Chris Jones, the Chiefs would have attempted a game-ending two-point convert if San Francisco had scored a touchdown on their opening drive.